Gun Forums banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
196 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Well, I've finally decided to jump on the band wagon. If anyone on these boards lives in the SF Bay Area and has an extra 'off list' AR lower that they would be willing to part with (preferably Stag, but I would consider several others) please let me know. I would like to do a FTF/PPT in the Bay Area as the transfer fees for shipped firearms are all way too high at my local gun shops. Let me know what ya got fellas.

-Chris
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
365 Posts
i got 2 superior arms lowers from SF's contact, and dros on them was 25 plus 45 for each item. bringing my total for 2 lowers and dros to 3 fiddy, check calguns.net i remember there was a cat selling them in san jose or something, he had LAR, Grizzly and Stag, his prefered FFL was the same guy I used.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
196 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Thanks for the heads up. Anyone else here have one bfore I try that?

-Chris
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
132 Posts
irvington arms will transfer them until "they are banned"...

nice attitude from the owner, bigmac (from calguns.net).

he can get them or they will FFL them for you...

IA is in fremont across the street from the the old tri-city sporting goods store...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
100 Posts
The Department of Justice (hereafter the [email protected]) has received
numerous contacts from the public and firearms industry personnel
regarding the legality of various AR-15/AK 47 "series" style firearms
that have not yet been identified as [email protected] assault weapons by the
Department. The Department is also aware of the recent high volume of
sales of these firearms.
The Department has the statutory authority to identify [email protected]
assault weapons. In 2000, the California Supreme Court upheld that
authority in Kasler v. Lockyer (2000) 23 Cal. 4th 472. The Department
updated the list of "series" weapons in 2000 (as ACategory [email protected] assault
weapons), shortly after the Kasler decision. The registration period
for Category 2 weapons ended on December 31, 2000.
The California Supreme Court reiterated in 2003 that Athe Attorney
General has the authority to determine that certain semiautomatic
firearms are assault weapons by simply identifying them as such in
the list published by the Attorney General in the California Code of
RegulationsYtwo types of firearms defined in section 12276 by the use
of the term series, namely the AK-47 series and the Colt AR-15
[email protected] Harrott v. County of Kings (2003) 25 Cal. 4th 1138, 1155.
Accordingly, the Department is currently in the process of
identifying those firearms in the state which are variations, with
minor differences, of AR-15/AK 47 "series" weapons. Once this process
is complete, the Department will promulgate a list and file it with
the Secretary of State=s office. Concurrently, the Department will
begin updating the Assault Weapon Identification Guide which is
currently available via the Department=s web-site at http://ag.ca.gov/
firearms/forms/index.html. Once the list of newly identified [email protected]
weapons is filed with the Secretary of State, citizens who possess
those weapons will have 90 days to register them with the Department
of Justice.

Newly identified [email protected] weapons cannot legally have the features
listed in Penal Code 12276.1 when they are registered. Those features
cannot legally be added after the firearms are registered as assault
weapons. The Penal Code 12276.1 features have been banned since
January 1, 2000, when SB 23 went into effect. The public was notified
of the prohibition on the specified features many years ago.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Page Two

The registration period for assault weapons with those
characteristics (Category 3 assault weapons) ended on December 31,
2000. Because non-"series" assault weapons with 12276.1 features may
not be offered for sale, manufactured, imported, or possessed in
California, it follows that newly registered "series" weapons may not
have the features listed in Penal Code 12276.1, either.
The prohibition on the features listed in Penal Code section 12276.1
is consistent with current DOJ policy that named [email protected] weapons are
illegal, unless registered, regardless of whether they have the
12276.1 features. It is also consistent with the intent of the
California state legislature to ban assault weapons, expressed in
1991 when Penal Code 12276(f) was enacted.
This section is declaratory of existing law, as amended, and a
clarification of the law and the Legislature=s intent which bans the
weapons enumerated in this section, the weapons included in Section
12276.5, and any other models which are only minor variations of
those weapons with minor differences, regardless of the manufacturer
[emphasis added].
It should be noted that individuals who timely registered ACategory
[email protected] and ACategory [email protected] assault weapons were allowed to keep or add the
12276.1 features on their firearms. Those generic features were not
illegal during the registration period for Category 1 assault
weapons. In August of 2000, when the Department identified the
Category 2 [email protected] weapons, it was legal to register weapons with
those characteristics as Category 3 assault weapons. Firearms with
those features could no longer be registered as of January 1, 2001.
Therefore, newly identified [email protected] (Category 4) weapons likewise
cannot have those features.

Registrants of newly identified series weapons cannot legally add
Penal Code section 12276.1 features to those firearms. The Department
intends to enforce this restriction through the assault weapon
registration process. Registration acknowledgment letters will
include an admonition to registrants that adding prohibited features
to newly registered assault weapons will invalidate registration. The
basis for valid registration will rest solely on the fact that the
Department identifies the receivers for these firearms as variations,
with minor differences, of already controlled AR-15/AK 47 [email protected]
weapons. All additional features of the newly identified "series"
weapons must conform with current California law.

Firearm manufacturers, wholesalers and dealers who misinform the
public about the ability to legally add prohibited features to these
newly listed firearms risk criminal prosecution. They could also face
civil penalties of up to $2,500 per violation under the state=s
Unfair Practices Act (California Business & Professions Code section
17000 et seq.).

This information will be distributed to criminal justice agencies
throughout the state, as well as to firearm dealers listed on the
Department's Centralized List, via the formal Information Bulletin
process.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
132 Posts
jamz said:
What does "Off List" mean?

when the dumb ass ban of "assault" rifles came about in 2000, stupid assholes listed each weapon per maker and name. and they listed certain characteristics what makes a banned rifle.

fast forward to 2005.

a few ingenious people started writing to the kalif DOJ. they asked about buying certain AR lowers that were not on the list (hence the OFF LIST LOWERS) assuming that they were built without the EVIL features.

one evil feature was a pistol grip. since the rifle like the keltec SU-16 was legal to own here, if an AR rifle was built without the pistol grip, guess what?

the DOJ said that was legal!

or, if you built an AR with a pistol, you CANNOT have any other evil features like a removable magazine.

at that time, the law on the books said, you must use a tool to remove a magazine. heck the law even said a cartridge is considered a tool.


so the next thing you know, law abiding citizens were buying the up like there was no tomorrow.

a low estimate of 30000. yes, that's 30k of AR (and a few AK) lowers were legally purchased in this sorry state.

myself... welll ;)



now, the DOJ were caught with their pants down. they are now trying to change the law. even thought they are not allowed to.

now, they want to change the words that says, you cannot have a lower that "can readily accept a magazine"....

blah blah blah... more bullshit from them.

as usual, lawsuits will fly.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
196 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
I had to put this project on the back burner for a while as I've started a new business. Thanks for the posts/contacts though guys. I hope to persue a build again in the next few months.

-Chris
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top