ok, Mr gay rights activist. no where was it implied that gay solders are less effective then straight solders. im no rocket scientist but if the person next to me becomes overwhelmingly attractive, i cant fight. not fight less effectively, not fight entirely. and you, little lesbian college student. don't make this shit to be more then it is. its not offensive that a military that does not allow gay people would consider something regarding sexual orientation as a weapon, or a means to combat an enemy.
i heard about this this morning on a radio show i listen to on the way to work. i actually called in to comment on the lunacy. i have yet to fathom a scenario where this is a worthy alternative in battle. even if it worked ideally, how would it possibly be a less then lethal alternative. consider;
Scenario A: slightly gay
Well this is right out. slightly gay people do not screw like drugged bunnies and would essentially be useless. they would simple 'be gay' in there off time and fight like normal soldiers
Scenario B: Insta gay with uncontrollable gay tendencies - 1 day duration
the bomb drops, within minutes the enemy is feeling the effects and terrible trance/house music starts to crescendo in the distance behind enemy lines. everyone is gay, we drop our guns and do like the animals do. great, what about tomorrow? drop another? how many days of consecutive gayness will the Geneva Convention allow? when that time is up, guess what, killing, low and behold is the only alternative. shoulda had conventional ordinance on that aircraft from the start.
Scenario C: Insta gay with uncontrollable gay tendencies - forever
Lets face it, anything between 1 day and forever and your essentially in the same pot above. could you posibly emagine? i think death by bullet would be better. and im IN NO WAY AGAINST GAY PEOPLE! if we REALLY need to get into 'my gay friend repetua' let me know, i have sources and can esily qualify this. but with the implied effects you would have a couple thousand guys fucking each other in the ass until death. weather it be exhaustion, mal nourishment, or excessive bleeding ile leave up to your imagination. but come on! why even fuckin bother? we are WAY outside the realm of "less then lethal" at this particular juncture.
Scenario D: you dont wana know scenario D, but im gana tell you cuz its funny. - gun = gay
ok, stick close now cuz it gets a little loopy here. lets say, by the grace of something cosmic we have scientists so attuned to the 'gay' chemical this hole apparatus is based on, that we can actually tie the release of said chemical to a physical object once the 'subject' ha been exposed. so, naturally you tie it to a gun. enemy pics up a gun BAM! insta gay, consult Scenario C.
sadly, the long term effects and the 'falling into the wrong hands' movie scenario are far more frightening then anything thus far.
Scenario D is my worst nightmare
/condones the use of such device on Westboro Baptist Church members